Please help me out here, Dr. Weinkle. As I read your figure from Wigley, et al, if methane emissions were to suddenly drop to zero, the net temperature change would be about 0.75 C? Is that correct? So, we are willing to eliminate an industry that generates $122 billion in revenues, in order to prevent temperatures from rising an amount that is undetectable, to meet a global standard (GWP) that lacks precise meaning or measurement?
Please tell me I'm wrong, someone, anyone...because if my interpretation is correct, this is insanity.
GWP-100...SBTi....Watershed....TCFD...WRI...WBCSD....WWF....Ceres....SEC...CFTC
It's the self-licking ice cream cone, Doc.
Please help me out here, Dr. Weinkle. As I read your figure from Wigley, et al, if methane emissions were to suddenly drop to zero, the net temperature change would be about 0.75 C? Is that correct? So, we are willing to eliminate an industry that generates $122 billion in revenues, in order to prevent temperatures from rising an amount that is undetectable, to meet a global standard (GWP) that lacks precise meaning or measurement?
Please tell me I'm wrong, someone, anyone...because if my interpretation is correct, this is insanity.
LNG become CO2 and H2O when burned … stopping LNG does nothing to stop CH4